And that doesn't mean that I don't think 911 was an inside job and that our country is run by corporate interest and that the drug war is completely out of line and thar our country is on the verge of facsism. I just don't care for the fuck.

why didn't you post the whole quote there?

"It's like they want to pigeonhole all of us into conspiracy nutbags when we're not debating things that are related to UFO's bringing down the towers or Building 7 or the Pentagon and so its feels like there's things in there that we’re not the conspiracy theorists on this particular issue. It seems to me like 19 amateurs with boxcutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75 percent of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory."

Cause I thought the portion of the quote I posted was sufficient.

"Following the publication of the article and its exaltation by the mainstream media as the final nail in the coffin for 9/11 conspiracy theories, it was revealed that senior researcher on the piece Benjamin Chertoff is the cousin of Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.

This means that Benjamin Chertoff was hired to write an article that would receive nationwide attention, about the veracity of the government's explanation of an event that led directly to the creation of Homeland Security, a body that his own cousin now heads.

This is unparalleled nepotism and completely dissolves the credibility of the article before one has even turned the first page."

Damnit, man! Here I am reading so many articles and trying to find some sort of credible truth in all this crap I have to wade through, and it seems like every time I turn around someone is disputing the credibility of someone else. I'm so confused. D:

where did you quote that from?

I'm still waiting.......

sorry skool girl, didn't know a question had been asked.

infowars of course. AFP release

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11 ... _piece.htm