and to buy luxury items.

Not sure on the credibility of this website. seems to have some sensationalist slant on a lot of the stories. checking into it now.

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46361

you've never heard of world net daily?

they're legit. a bit conservative sometimes, but legit nonetheless. WND is where druge, farah and o'reilly got their start.

I tend to stick to news services like reuters and cnn.....and you don't think drudge and oreilly are sensationalist?

please quote the statement that lead you to type this out. i'm curious.

I asked you a question, can you answer it?

The question is rhetorical and irrelevant. I addressed your question on credibility and then asked me if I thought they were sensationalist, I was just wondering what lead you to bring that question up.

those who live in glass houses?

I see, you think that because one is sensationalistic, they lack credibility and thus I live in a glass house.

your powers of reasoning and deduction are truely staggering!

Thanks! You could have those powers too if you'd just stop subscribing to logical fallicies.

josh , you'll never win with this guy.

we're not very bright

but apparently, conservative teens are credible.

( I posted a comment to ol' Ian on that politicalteen site, about how teenyboppers have negligible life experience to have a "set in my ways" attitude, and he closed the comments section without retort) .

they should stick to playing video games .

Well, duh; If you give someone any sort of funds that aren't food stamps or regulated in any sort of way as to how they can use it, then you know people are going to hit up the strip clubs, bars, and whatever else they can get their hands on. [imo]

Oh! Oh! Hey guys, we lost everything in a hurricane, let's go use this money to gamble! We're sure to win billions! After all, luck is OBVIOUSLY on our side.

It's frustrating that I'm the only one here who actually caught the irony that Dirk is posting an article from a syndicated website that many would consider a "conspiracy" website.

But of course, this article must be full of shit because Bill O'Reilly is a sensationalist.