Falling in Love

airwreck · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:09 pm

jeremy baker wrote:

wizdumb wrote:

you fallin IN love too jerm?

uhm certainly not with mr. kent.

i meant with your new girl you douche..... :silly:

Jeremy Baker · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:13 pm

wizdumb wrote:

jeremy baker wrote:

wizdumb wrote:

you fallin IN love too jerm?

uhm certainly not with mr. kent.

i meant with your new girl you douche..... :silly:

no. shes kinda pissing me off right now since she already flaked on dinner plans, and not been online for the last 2 days, and has no phone.

ok basically she just nullified any chance we had

airwreck · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:15 pm

jeremy baker wrote:

wizdumb wrote:

jeremy baker wrote:

wizdumb wrote:

you fallin IN love too jerm?

uhm certainly not with mr. kent.

i meant with your new girl you douche..... :silly:

no. shes kinda pissing me off right now since she already flaked on dinner plans, and not been online for the last 2 days, and has no phone.

ok basically she just nullified any chance we had

then she'll call you for some late night booty and its on like donkey kongs dong again.... :badteeth:

Kelley · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:17 pm

jeremy baker wrote:

has no phone.

baker, when you were listing all of her great qualities to me, you neglected to mention this!

WHO DOESN'T HAVE A PHONE???

Jeremy Baker · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:19 pm

Kelley wrote:

jeremy baker wrote:

has no phone.

baker, when you were listing all of her great qualities to me, you neglected to mention this!

WHO DOESN'T HAVE A PHONE???

tweakers who sit locked in their house doing tweak all day?

Kelley · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:22 pm

jeremy baker wrote:

Kelley wrote:

jeremy baker wrote:

has no phone.

baker, when you were listing all of her great qualities to me, you neglected to mention this!

WHO DOESN'T HAVE A PHONE???

tweakers who sit locked in their house doing tweak all day?

ALSO SOMETHING YOU NEGLECTED TO MENTION!

Jeremy Baker · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:26 pm

Kelley wrote:

jeremy baker wrote:

Kelley wrote:

jeremy baker wrote:

has no phone.

baker, when you were listing all of her great qualities to me, you neglected to mention this!

WHO DOESN'T HAVE A PHONE???

tweakers who sit locked in their house doing tweak all day?

ALSO SOMETHING YOU NEGLECTED TO MENTION!

well she told me she quit. however all signs are pointing to not.

also logan and i had a mano e mano and i learned some stuff.

bleh. too good to be true.

Kurt · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:29 pm

jeremy baker wrote:

Kelley wrote:

jeremy baker wrote:

has no phone.

baker, when you were listing all of her great qualities to me, you neglected to mention this!

WHO DOESN'T HAVE A PHONE???

tweakers who sit locked in their house doing tweak all day?

dude.. you need to raise your standards before you catch some shit.

Jeremy Baker · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:31 pm

Kurt wrote:

jeremy baker wrote:

Kelley wrote:

jeremy baker wrote:

has no phone.

baker, when you were listing all of her great qualities to me, you neglected to mention this!

WHO DOESN'T HAVE A PHONE???

tweakers who sit locked in their house doing tweak all day?

dude.. you need to raise your standards before you catch some shit.

i didnt sleep with this one! :-D

Kelley · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:33 pm

YAY! BAKER KEPT IT IN HIS PANTS!

*throws confetti*

Jeremy Baker · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:37 pm

restraint = good.

LeAnn · **Posted:** Tue May 18, 2004 5:44 pm

if only some people could keep it in their pants more often...

fireside · **Posted:** Wed May 19, 2004 1:38 am

jeremy baker wrote:

restraint = good.

definitely. i find that every time i ruin a first meeting with sex, i've ruined any other chance of hanging out. it's as though it's a challenge, and once i've risen to it and defeated it, i'm ready to move on.

Jeremy Baker · **Posted:** Wed May 19, 2004 5:05 am

fireside wrote:

jeremy baker wrote:

restraint = good.

definitely. i find that every time i ruin a first meeting with sex, i've ruined any other chance of hanging out. it's as though it's a challenge, and once i've risen to it and defeated it, i'm ready to move on.

yep.

**chris** · **Posted:** Wed May 19, 2004 12:27 pm

jeremy baker wrote:

tweakers who sit locked in their house doing tweak all day?

yucky.

~*Robot Ninja*~ · **Posted:** Sat May 22, 2004 7:20 pm

Kelley wrote:

it helps if you know the person longer than a couple of weeks.

just a tip.

good luck though.

yea werd....you're bound to fall in love with anyone if you eat enough tabs with them.

omcreator · **Posted:** Sat May 22, 2004 8:42 pm

love is over-rated.

nobody has love until a mutual effort in the concentration of selflessness is acheived on a regular basis. even during the most passionate moments of celebration, birth, death, and sex, still.. people lack love. you will find moments of true divine will (love) in the smallest scarcity of potent portions through life. you arent "in love".. love is "in you" .

love is the law. love under will. :smokin:

^^^^
the universe knows this. the love our cosmos has put forth is obviously immense. its burning and evolving and breeding new formulas for existance as an infinite blackness, while we are posted up here on the earth plantation enjoying ourselves as the embodiment and cutting edge of this divine effort. We have an atmosphere that regulates our existance. we have the ability to love , just as it has loved to the point of bearing our existance, wich is sustained in all its brilliance by the skin of its own teeth.

~*Robot Ninja*~ · **Posted:** Sun May 23, 2004 6:54 pm

ommy c wrote:

the universe knows this. the love our cosmos has put forth is obviously immense. its burning and evolving and breeding new formulas for existance as an infinite blackness, while we are posted up here on the earth plantation enjoying ourselves as the embodiment and cutting edge of this divine effort. We have an atmosphere that regulates our existance. we have the ability to love , just as it has loved to the point of bearing our existance, wich is sustained in all its brilliance by the skin of its own teeth.

Di-Electric · **Posted:** Mon May 24, 2004 12:46 am

99% of all people think thier in love when they're really not.

Isn't love supposed to be unconditional and of a giving nature?

Most of the time, people get into relationships to satisfy thier OWN needs. Sorry, but that's not love.

But hey, who isn't just trying to get thier nut?

chris.keebler · **Posted:** Mon May 24, 2004 2:58 am

be quiet, douche bag.

Di-Electric · **Posted:** Mon May 24, 2004 3:05 am

chris.keebler wrote:

be quiet, douche bag.

Haha, you can't make me stop posting.

Fag.

chris.keebler · **Posted:** Mon May 24, 2004 3:06 am

-points down to sig-

SIG HEIL.

Malu. · **Posted:** Mon May 24, 2004 3:13 am

and so it continues. :tired:

chris.keebler · **Posted:** Mon May 24, 2004 3:14 am

no no.. im done, i swear. :)

justin gomez · **Posted:** Mon May 24, 2004 3:15 am

chris.keebler wrote:

no no.. im done, i swear. :)

yeah it lost its flare.

Falling in Love

Who is online

Social Network

Night Club Culture

GlobalBeatz.net